Incidence Of Etomidate-induced Myoclonus Research Articles

Low-dose nalmefene pretreatment reduces etomidate-induced myoclonus: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

This study compared the effectiveness of nalmefene and fentanyl in reducing the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus. One hundred fifty patients were randomized to receive 0.25ug/kg of nalmefene, 1ug/kg of fentanyl, or the same volume of normal saline 3 minutes prior to etomidate-induced anesthesia. The primary observational indexes were the severity level and incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus, and the secondary observational index included blood pressure, heart rate, and the incidence of adverse effects from anesthesia induction to resuscitation, such as cough, chest wall rigidity, dizziness, nausea, pain after awakening, and intraoperative awareness. The incidence of myoclonus was significantly lower in the nalmefene group (8.0%) than in the fentanyl group (32.0%) (P = .003) and in the normal saline group (72.0%) (P = .000). The severity level of myoclonus in the nalmefene group was significantly lower than the fentanyl group (P = .001) and normal saline group (P = .000). Meanwhile, the incidences of cough and chest wall rigidity during anesthesia induction were significantly lower in the nalmefene group compared with the fentanyl group (P = .003, P = .027). There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate and mean arterial pressure among the 3 gruops (P > .05). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse effects among the 3 groups during recovery from anesthesia (P > .05). Intravenous injection of 0.25ug/kg of nalmefene 3 minutes prior to etomidate is more effective in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus during general anesthesia than 1ug/kg of fentanyl.

Comparative assessment of dexmedetomidine and butorphanol for attenuation of etomidate-induced myoclonus: A double-blind, randomised controlled study.

Etomidate is a popular induction agent, but its use is associated with myoclonus in 50%-80% of non-premedicated patients. This study aims to compare dexmedetomidine and butorphanol for their relative efficacy in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus. This randomised study was conducted after obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance and written informed consent from sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II consenting patients between 18 and 60 years of age of either sex who had been scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg (Group D) or butorphanol 0.015 mg/kg (Group B). Both the drugs were given as an infusion over a period of 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of myoclonic movements after etomidate, and the secondary outcomes were the severity of myoclonus, changes in the haemodynamic parameters and incidence of airway complications. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's t-test, and non-normally distributed variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data were analysed using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. The incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus was significantly higher in group B compared to group D (P = 0.035). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of myoclonus grade in patients of group D was 0.00 (0.00-3.00), and group B was 2.50 (0.00-3.00) (P = 0.035). Haemodynamics and airway-related complications were comparable between the groups. Dexmedetomidine was more effective than butorphanol in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus.

To study the effect of three different doses of dexmedetomidine as premedication on the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus

Background and Aims: Etomidate, a carboxylated imidazole is a rapid-acting nonbarbiturate, nonopioid hypnotic agent that has unique hemodynamic stability, favorable toxic profile, and rapid recovery after a single dose. Myoclonus may occur when etomidate is used for induction of general anesthesia. We tested the hypothesis that premedication with different doses of dexmedetomidine reduces the incidence and severity of myoclonus as well as the side effects induced by etomidate.Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was done on ninety patients undergoing elective surgical procedures who were randomly allocated into three groups for intravenous administration of premedication of 0.3 μg/kg (Group DL), 0.5 μg/kg (Group DM), and 1.0 μg/kg (Group DH) dexmedetomidine in 100 mL normal saline 10 min before induction of general anesthesia with 0.3 mg/kg etomidate. The primary outcome was to evaluate the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus, while the severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus and the incidence of adverse effects were taken as secondary outcomes.Results: The incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus was reduced by 13.3% in Group DL, 36.7% in Group DM, and 56.7% in Group DH. The severity of myoclonus was significantly reduced in Group DH as compared to Group DL and DM (P = 0.001). Side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, and nausea and vomiting were comparable among the three groups.Conclusion: Premedication with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg before induction of general anesthesia not only resulted in a 56.7% reduction in the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus but also reduced the severity of myoclonus, without inducing any significant adverse effects, as compared to other two doses.

Effect of pre-treatment on induction of anaesthesia with etomidate: A comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam–fentanyl combination

Background: Because of its prompt onset of action and clearance, the use of etomidate as an anaesthetic induction agent is increasing in clinical practice. However, etomidate-induced myoclonus (EIM) remains a prevalent issue. Such myoclonic activity can be prevented by the administration of drugs that inhibit subcortical neuronal activity. Aims: This study was designed to compare the effects of pre-treatment with dexmedetomidine and fentanyl–midazolam combination on EIM as well as on attenuation of pharyngolaryngeal reflex. Materials and Methods: One hundred adult patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Grades 1 or 2 posted for elective surgery were enrolled and were randomly divided into two groups of 50 patients each. Group D received dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) in over 10 min and Group F received midazolam (0.02 mg/kg) + fentanyl (2 μg/kg) intravenously. Haemodynamic variables, incidence and severity of myoclonus were recorded. Results: The incidence of EIM was lower in Group F (26%) when compared to Group D (40%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.28). Eighteen per cent of the subjects in Group F had Grade 1 myoclonus as compared to 32% of Group D, whereas 8% of the subjects in Group F had Grade 2 myoclonus as compared to 6% of Group D. None of the patients in Group F experienced myoclonus of Grade 3, whereas 2% of the subjects had Grade 3 myoclonus. Conclusion: Administration of a combination of fentanyl and midazolam, along with dexmedetomidine as a pre-treatment, has been found to be an effective strategy for mitigating the incidence of myoclonus.

Effect of Pre-Treatment with a Combination of Fentanyl and Midazolam for Prevention of Etomidate-Induced Myoclonus.

ObjectivePre-treatment with either fentanyl or midazolam has previously been used to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus (EIM). The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of pre-treatment with a combination of midazolam and fentanyl in reducing the incidence and severity of EIM.MethodsThis prospective, randomised, double-blind study was conducted on 210 surgical patients allocated to three study groups. Group F patients received fentanyl 2 μg kg−1 and 5 mL saline. Group M patients received midazolam 0.03 mg kg−1 and 5 mL saline. Group FM patients received fentanyl 2 μg kg−1 plus midazolam 0.03 mg kg−1. The study drugs were administered intravenously over 30 s. Five minutes after study drug administration, etomidate 0.3 mg kg−1 was administered over 60 s. Patients were observed for 1 min for occurrence and severity of EIM.ResultsThe incidence of EIM was 34/70 (48.6%), 55/70 (78.6%) and 11/70 (15.7%) in groups F, M and FM, respectively (p=0.001). Myoclonus of moderate or severe grade occurred in 23/70 (32.9%), 45/70 (64.3%) and 6/70 (8.6%) in groups F, M and FM, respectively (p=0.001). Patients who experienced myoclonus exhibited a significantly higher percentage change in post-induction heart rate (p=0.02), systolic blood pressure (p=0.001) and mean blood pressure (p=0.001) from pre-induction values than those who did not.ConclusionPre-treatment with a combination of fentanyl and midazolam is more effective than that with fentanyl or midazolam alone in reducing the incidence and severity of EIM. Myoclonus is associated with a higher post-induction haemodynamic variation.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on etomidate-induced myoclonus: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

Background: Etomidate used for the induction of general anesthesia can result in myoclonus. We tested the hypothesis that pretreatment with dexmedetomidine (Dex) reduces the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus during the induction of general anesthesia.Materials and methods: One hundred patients who were scheduled for selective operations under general anesthesia were included in this randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive either Dex 0.5 µg/kg in 20 mL of normal saline or the same volume of normal saline as pretreatment agents 15 mins before the injection of etomidate 0.3 mg/kg. The primary endpoint was the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus. Secondary endpoints were the severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus and the incidence of adverse effects from the onset of action of Dex or normal saline to the injection of etomidate, such as dizziness, respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension and nausea/vomiting.Results: All of the 100 patients completed the trial. Dex resulted in a significant 38% reduction in the number of patients who experienced etomidate-induced myoclonus: 13 (26%) vs 32 (64%) (P=0.0001). Additionally, the severity of myoclonus was also reduced in the Dex group than that in the placebo group (P=0.02). Incidence of dizziness, respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension and nausea/vomiting was similar in both groups.Conclusions: Pretreatment with Dex 0.5 µg/kg 15 mins before the induction of general anesthesia not only resulted in a 38% reduction in the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus, but also reduced the severity of myoclonus, without inducing any adverse effects.

Pretreatment with lidocaine reduces both incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ObjectiveOne conundrum that frequently occurs during clinical anesthesia is etomidate-induced myoclonus, which results in multiple risks. The aim of the study was to evaluate systematically the effect of pretreatment with lidocaine on preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus.Materials and methodsThe literature search was performed from the inception to April 2018 in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. All randomized controlled trials that used lidocaine to prevent etomidate-induced myoclonus were enrolled. The primary outcome included the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus. The data were combined to calculate the risk ratio and relevant 95% CI. A meta-analysis was performed following the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement.ResultsA total of eight studies were enrolled, and the existing evidence indicated that 1) pretreatment with lidocaine can reduce the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus (the incidence of myoclonus: 37.6% in lidocaine vs 73.6% in saline, risk ratio =0.46, with 95% CI [0.34, 0.63], P<0.0001); 2) the pretreatment with lidocaine can reduce the incidence of mild, moderate, and severe myoclonus; 3) a dose of pretreatment with lidocaine cannot significantly decrease the duration of myoclonus compared to placebo; 4) the administration of lidocaine produced no effect on the stable hemodynamic parameters and no more additional adverse effects.ConclusionPretreatment with lidocaine could be served as one effective approach to decrease both the incidence and the severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus, with limited influence on the hemodynamic stability of patients. However, to confirm precise safety and efficacy of such intervention, more high-quality evidence is necessary.

Nalbuphine pretreatment for prevention of etomidate induced myoclonus: A prospective, randomized and double-blind study.

Background and Aims:Etomidate induced myoclonus (EM) is a common and hazardous sequel. Premedication with a number of opioids has been shown to effectively attenuate EM. However, there is no reported literature evaluating the effect of nalbuphine pretreatment on EM. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine intravenous (IV) pretreatment for prevention of EM.Material and Methods:This prospective randomized double-blind and placebo controlled study was conducted in a medical college associated tertiary hospital. One hundred patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive: 10 ml of normal saline (Group I) or 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine in 10 ml of normal saline (Group II) 150 s before injection etomidate 0.3 mg/kg administered IV over 20 s. The patients were assessed for the presence and severity of etomidate induced vascular pain (EP) and EM while injecting etomidate and for the next 2 min, respectively. The patients were monitored for sedation, nausea/vomiting, headache, dizziness, and respiratory depression for 24 h postoperatively. Student's t-test, Chi-square test, or Fisher exact test were used wherever appropriate and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results and Conclusion:Both the groups were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics. Nalbuphine pretreatment significantly reduced the incidence (20% vs. 72%; respiratory rate = 0.294, 95% confidence interval: 0.160–0.496, P < 0.01) and severity of EM without any significant increase in the incidence of adverse effects. Nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg IV pretreatment significantly reduces the incidence and severity of EM with side-effect profile comparable to saline placebo.

Comparison of different doses of intravenous lignocaine on etomidate-induced myoclonus: A prospective randomised and placebo-controlled study.

Background and Aims:Etomidate-induced myoclonus (EM) is observed in 50%–80% of unpremedicated patients. Low-dose lignocaine has been shown to attenuate but not abolish the EM. The aim of this prospective, randomised controlled study was to compare the different doses of lignocaine on the incidence and severity of EM.Methods:Two hundred adult patients were randomly assigned into four groups to receive saline placebo (Group I) or IV lignocaine 0.5 mg/kg (Group II), 1 mg/kg (Group III) or 1.5 mg/kg (Group IV) 2 min before injection etomidate 0.3 mg/kg IV. The patients were assessed for the EM using a four-point intensity scoring system. Our primary outcome was the incidence of myoclonus at 2 min (EM2). The incidence of myoclonus at 1 min (EM1) and severity of myoclonus constituted the secondary outcomes. ANOVA and Pearson Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis and P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Results:The incidence of EM was significantly reduced in Groups III [(EM1: 32% vs. 60%, P = 0.009); (EM2: 42% vs. 76%, P = 0.001)] and IV (EM2: 54% vs. 76%, P = 0.035) compared with Group I. Lignocaine 1 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg significantly reduced the incidence of severe myoclonus at 2 min (14% each) compared to Groups I (42%, P = 0.003) and II (32%, P = 0.032).Conclusion:Lignocaine 1 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg IV pretreatment significantly reduces the incidence of EM, with maximum attenuation observed with 1 mg/kg.

Effect of dexmedetomidine in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus: a meta-analysis.

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine in the prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus.MethodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the use of dexmedetomidine in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI. We extracted data and assessed the quality of the literature and adopted RevMan 5.2 to conduct meta-analysis on each effective index and employed funnel plot to test publication bias.ResultsThe results showed that the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus in the dexmedetomidine treated groups was significantly lower than that of the control groups (risk ratio [RR]=0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.15, 0.47], P<0.00001). With regard to the severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus, incidences of etomidate-induced myoclonus in the dexmedetomidine treated groups resulting in mild myoclonus (RR=0.37, 95% CI [0.19, 0.75], P=0.006), moderate myoclonus (RR=0.21, 95% CI [0.12, 0.37], P<0.00001), or severe myoclonus (RR=0.18, 95% CI [0.08, 0.38], P<0.00001) were significantly lower than those of the control groups. No statistically significant difference was found (RR=0.70, 95% CI [0.47, 1.04], P=0.08) between etomidate-induced myoclonus in the dexmedetomidine treated groups and that of the midazolam treated groups.ConclusionDexmedetomidine can effectively prevent the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus and reduce the severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus. In addition, there were no significant differences between the effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus.

Priming with atracurium efficiently suppresses etomidate-induced myoclonus

IntroductionEtomidate is a hypnotic drug widely used as an intravenous anesthetic induction agent. The incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus has been reported as much as 50–80% after induction making it an undesirable drug for induction. ObjectiveOur aim is to use a priming dose of atracurium to suppress etomidate-induced myoclonus during induction of anesthesia. MethodsIn a double-blinded clinical trial 80 patients were randomly given either atracurium (20% of ED95 × kg) or saline as a priming agent. Then, induction of anesthesia was performed using 0.4 mg/kg etomidate. Age, weight, body mass index, bispectral index (BIS) monitor, and duration and grade of myoclonus were recorded. ResultsThe demographic characteristics, age, body mass index, BIS score, and weight were not significantly different between the atracurium (ATRA) priming group and control groups. The binomial regression model showed that BMI was an independent predictor variable for myoclonus (OR: 2.1, CI 95%: 1.7–7.5, p = 0.032). In this model, adjusted odds ratios (OR) of myoclonus (multivariate logistic regression analysis) in the control group was 6.6 (95% CI: 1.5–9.7, p = 0.013). ConclusionLow-dose atracurium priming could effectively suppress etomidate-induced myoclonus.

Pretreatment with Dexmedetomidine or Thiopental Decreases Myoclonus after Etomidate: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial

Myoclonic movements are common problems during induction of anesthesia with etomidate. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of pretreatment with dexmedetomidine (0.5 microg/kg) and thiopental (1 mg/kg) on the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus and postoperative pain. A prospective double-blind study was conducted at a university hospital. Ninety patients (ASA physical status I-II) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: patients were pretreated with either dexmedetomidine (0.5 microg/kg), thiopental (1 mg/kg), or saline before induction of anesthesia with etomidate. One minute after the injection of study drugs, etomidate, 0.3 mg/kg was given. Myoclonus was assessed on a scale of 0 to 3. Recovery time, postoperative pain score, and hemodynamic variables were recorded during the intraoperative and postoperative period. Headache, nausea, vomiting, and coughing were noted during the study. The incidence and the intensity of myoclonus was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine and thiopental groups (34%, 36%) than in the control group (64%) (P<0.05). The postoperative pain score at 30 min in the thiopental group was significantly higher than in the dexmedetomidine and control groups (63%) (P<0.05). We concluded that pretreatment with dexmedetomidine or thiopental is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonic muscle movements and pretreatment with thiopental increases the postoperative pain.

Prévention des myoclonies induites par l'étomidate en utilisant une priming dose

Objective To investigate the influence of pretreatment with a low dose of etomidate (priming dose) on the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus. Study design Prospective randomized double-blind study. Methods Forty six patients ASA physical status I – II, scheduled for abdominal elective surgery, were allocated randomly to receive either pre-treatment 0.03 mg/kg of etomidate (priming group) or placebo (control group). Sixty-seconds after the pre-treatment was injected, anesthesia was induced with etomidate 0.3 mg/kg and 60 seconds later induction was completed with fentanyl (3 μg/kg) and vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg). The occurrence and intensity of myoclonus were graded clinically by a blinded observer as: 0 = no myoclonus, 1 = mild myoclonus, 2 = moderate myoclonus and 3 = severe myoclonus. Statistical analysis: Fisher test exact for qualitative variable and Student t-test for quantitative variables. Results Demographic data and the average dose of etomidate used during the induction were similar in the 2 groups (0.29 ± 0.032 mg/kg in the priming group and 0.30 ± 0.029 mg/kg in the control group). Twenty patients (87%) in the control group experienced myoclonic movements whereas only 6 patients (26%) in the control group had such movements ( P < 0,001). Conclusion Pretreatment with etomidate (0.03 mg/kg), given 60 seconds before induction of anesthesia, is effective at reducing etomidate-induced myoclonus, without related side-effect.

Magnesium Sulfate Pretreatment Reduces Myoclonus After Etomidate

Myoclonic movements and pain on injection are common problems during induction of anesthesia with etomidate. We investigated the influence of pretreatment with magnesium and two doses of ketamine on the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus and pain. A prospective double-blind study was performed on 100 ASA physical status I-III patients who were randomized into 4 groups according to the pretreatment drug: ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, ketamine 0.5 mg/kg, magnesium sulfate (Mg) 2.48 mmol, or normal saline. Ninety seconds after the pretreatment, anesthesia was induced with etomidate 0.2 mg/kg. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg was used as the muscle relaxant. An anesthesiologist, blinded to group allocation, recorded the myoclonic movements, pain, and sedation on a scale between 0-3. Nineteen of the 25 patients receiving Mg (76%) did not have myoclonic movements after the administration of etomidate, whereas 18 patients (72%) in the ketamine 0.5 mg/kg, 16 patients (64%) in the ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, and 18 patients (72%) in the control group experienced myoclonic movements (P < 0.05). We conclude that Mg 2.48 mmol administered 90 s before the induction of anesthesia with etomidate is effective in reducing the severity of etomidate-induced myoclonic muscle movements and that ketamine does not reduce the incidence of myoclonic movements.

Pretreatment with sufentanil reduces the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus,

Pretreatment with sufentanil reduces the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus,

Pretreatment with sufentanil reduces the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus,

Pretreatment with sufentanil reduces the incidence of etomidate-induced myoclonus,